David v. Kumaran
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed an appeal for default due to uncured defects despite multiple opportunities provided to the appellant.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for default.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2016/28TH PHALGUNA, 1937
AS.No. 641 of 2000 (D)
OS.618/1992 OF ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, NORTH PARAVUR DATED 31-08-1999
APPELLANT(S)/PLAINTIFF:
DAVID, S/O.OUSEPHKUTTY, MANIYAMCHERI, AAIMURIKARA, KOOVAPADY VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNAD TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.R.VENKETESH SRI.P.R.RAJA
RESPONDENT(S)/DEFENDANTS:
1. KUMARAN, S/O.BLAYIKONNAN, KODANAD KARA, KODANAD VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNAD TALUK.
2. KURIAKOSE, S/O.THOMA, PARVELIKUDY HOUSE, PERUMBAVOOR KARA, DO. VILLAGE.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
DAVID, S/O.OUSEPHKUTTY, MANIYAMCHERI, AAIMURIKARA, KOOVAPADY VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNAD TALUK.
- respondent
KUMARAN, S/O.BLAYIKONNAN, KODANAD KARA, KODANAD VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNAD TALUK.
- respondent
KURIAKOSE, S/O.THOMA, PARVELIKUDY HOUSE, PERUMBAVOOR KARA, DO. VILLAGE.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court