Aseena v. Ibrahim
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala disposed of Second Appeal No. 189 of 2002 as settled out of court based on the concession made by the appellant's counsel. All interlocutory applications were closed.
What did the court decide?
Settlement of the appeal and closure of all interlocutory applications.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2016/12TH CHAITHRA, 1938
SA.No. 189 of 2002 (E)
----------------------(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN AS.NO. 43/1995 & CROSS APPEAL OF ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, NORTH PARAVUR DATED 23-06-2001)
(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS.NO. 562/1992 OF MUNSIFF COURT, NORTH PARAVUR DATED 21-12-1994)
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
ASEENA, D/O. KOCHUNNY, AGED 19 YEARS, RESIDING AT VATTAPARAMBU, PURAYIDATHI, KUTTIKATTUKARA, KADUNGALLOOR VILLAGE, ALUVA.
BY ADV. SRI.C.A.MAJEED
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT :
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Aseena
- respondent
Ibrahim
- respondent
Mrs. Jameela Ibrahim
- respondent
Ms. Jaseela
- respondent
Ms. Basila
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court