Ammini v. Sethu Rathnam
Case brief
What is this about?
In this second appeal, the High Court of Kerala, citing the stay order in concurrent C.M. applications, dismissed both regular second appeals and closed all interlocutory applications without recording reasons.
What did the court decide?
Second appeals dismissed; all interlocutory applications closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2016/11TH CHAITHRA, 1938
RSA.No. 76 of 2015
JUDGMENT DATED 26-11-2010 IN AS 7/2007 OF ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, IRINJALAKUDA
JUDGMENT DATED 28-11-2006 IN OS 1045/1998 OF MUNSIFF COURT, KODUNGALLUR
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
AMMINI, AGED 72 YEARS, W/O.BALAKRISHNAN, PALAPETTY PADINJAREPURAKKAL HOSUE, KAIPAMANGALAM VILLAGE & DESOM, KODUNGALLOOR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.K.S.BHARATHAN
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
AMMINI
- respondent
SETHU RATHNAM
- respondent
RAJA RATHNAM
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court