Gomathy v. C.Shyamala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court noted that the parties had settled their dispute via a compromise petition. Consequently, the impugned decisions were set aside, and the underlying suit was disposed of in terms of the compromise.
What did the court decide?
Impugned decisions set aside; suit disposed of in terms of the compromise.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2016/15TH CHAITHRA, 1938
RSA.No. 228 of 2011 (B)
-----------------------
AS 5/2007 OF III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM OS 1682/2003 OF I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:
1. GOMATHY WRITTEN IN THE PLAINT AND JUDGEMENT AS GOMATHY AMMA, W/O.LATE SANKARAN KUTTY, AGED 66, RESIDING AT VADAKKEKATTAKKAL, CHADIYARA, POOJAPPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. RAJMOHAN, S/O.LATE SANKARAN KUTTY, AGED 46, WRITTEN IN THE PLAINT AND JUDGEMENT AS RESIDING AT VADAKKEKATAKKAL, CHADIYARA, POOJAPPURA BUT RESIDING AT "AKSHAYA", ORUTTAMBALAM, VALIYARATHALA, MALAYINKIL.
*** 3. VIJAYA RAGHAVAN, S/O.LATE SANKARAN KUTTY, AGED 39, RESIDING AT VADAKKEKATAKKAL, CHADIYARA, POOJAPPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.(DIED) (RECORDED)**
Parties & counsel
- appellant
GOMATHY AGED 66 AND OTHERS
- respondent
C. SHYAMALA AGED 49
Coram
P.B. SURESH KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court