Nabeesa v. Balkees
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court dismissed the second appeal as abated. The court observed that all appellants are deceased and no legal heirs initiated the appeal, rendering it unpressable.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/26TH KARTHIKA, 1938
SA.No. 15 of 2003 (B)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 03-08-2002 IN AS 238/1994 of I ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, PALAKKAD
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 07-07-1994 IN OS 33/1991 of PRL.MUNSIFF COURT, PALAKKAD
APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 4/PLAINTIFFS NO.2 TO 4:
- NABEESA, W/O. ABDUL AZEEZ, KAVILPADAM, NEELIKKADU, PALAKKAD TALUK & DISTRICT.(DIED)
- SULEKHA, W/O. SYED MOHAMMED ROWTHER, PUDUNAGARAM, KACHERIVATTARAM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.(DIED)
- BEEVATHU, W/O. MOHAMMED HANEEFA, KIZHAKKUMBRAM, PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. (DIED)
(ALL THE APPELLANTS ARE RECORDED AS NO MORE VIDE JUDGMENT DATED 17.11.2016 IN SA.15/2003)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Nabeesa, W.O. Abdul Azeez
- appellant
Sulekha, W.O. Syed Mohammed Rowther
- appellant
Beevathu, W.O. Mohammed Hanea
- respondent
Balkees, W.O. Shahul Hameed
- respondent
Ayisumma, W.O. Muthu @ Mohammed Hussain
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court