Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. Court refused adjournment seeked by appellant and decided to dismiss the appeal on the date of final hearing.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/25TH KARTHIKA, 1938
SA.No. 174 of 2000 (D)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 05-06-1998 IN AS 34/1994 of I ADDL.DISTRICT COURT,THRISSUR
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 25-08-1993 IN OS 29/1981 of MUNSIFF COURT,CHAVAKKAD
APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS 2 TO 4; 4th DEFENDANT AND LRs OF DECEASED 7TH RESPONDENT:
SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN
RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANT, RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
....2
SA.No. 174 of 2000 (D)
2
(ADDL.R5 IMPLEADED AS THE SOLE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE DECEASED R2 AS PER ORDER DTD.17.11.05 IN CMP.2247/02)
R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.V.MATHEW R3 BY ADV. SMT.BIJIMOL JOSE R3 & 5 BY ADVS.SMT.PREETHY KARUNAKARAN SRI.RAJESH R. KORMATH SRI.ANISH S.AMBADY R4 BY ADV. SRI.WILSON URMESE
THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OKB
K.HARILAL, J.
S.A. No.174 of 2000
Dated this the 16th day of November, 2016
JUDGMENT ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The counsel representing the learned counsel for the appellants seeks time. Since the case is posted for disposal, this Court is not inclined to adjourn the same. Hence the appeal will stand dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/K.HARILAL, Judge.
okb
SAVITHRY AMMA AND OTHERS
KAMALAKSHY AMMA AND OTHERS
K. HARILAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
