The High Court, Ernakulam, disposed of a Regular Second Appeal stating that the matter in dispute had been settled through mediation. The Memorandum of Agreement was incorporated, and the appeal was disposed of based on the settlement terms.
Disposal of the Regular Second Appeal on the basis of a mediation settlement and memorandum of agreement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/26TH KARTHIKA, 1938
RSA.NO. 748 OF 2016 (E)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.11.2015 IN A.S. NO. 61 OF 2010 OF THE SUB COURT,KOTTARAKKARA
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.01.2010 IN O.S. NO. 141 OF 2008 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, KOTTARAKKARA
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:
1. RUDHRANI, W/O. DR.SREENIVASAN, AGED 76 YEARS, LAISY BHAVAN, KADAKKAL MURI, KADAKKAL VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA TALUK.
2. LAISY, AGED 40 YEARS, D/O. RUDRANI, LAISY BHAVAN, KADAKKAL MURI, KADAKKAL VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA TALUK.
3. JESSY, AGED 33 YEARS, D/O. RUDRANI, LAISY BHAVAN, KADAKKAL MURI, KADAKKAL VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER GEORGE
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
---------------------------------
DHARMARAJAN, AGED 70 YEARS, S/O. RAGHAVAN, PUTHENVILA VEEDU, SANKAR NAGAR, KUTTIKKADU MURI, KADAKKAL VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA TALUK-691536.
BY ADVS. SRI.D.SAJEEV SMT.LIGEY ANTONY
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
DST
K. HARILAL, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
R.S.A.No. 748 of 2016
- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of November, 2016
J U D G M E N T
The matter in dispute involved in this Regular Second Appeal has been settled, by way of mediation and the Memorandum of agreement entered into between
the appellants and the respondent is also incorporated along with the report. The terms of settlement will form a part of this judgment and this Regular Second Appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Sd/-
K. HARILAL,
DST
//True copy//
P.A. To Judge
RUDHRANI
LAISY
JESSY
DHARMARAJAN
K. HARILAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
