The High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam dismissed a regular second appeal on non-prosecution, where the counsel stated there was no instruction from the parties to continue the matter.
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/2ND KARTHIKA, 1938
RSA.NO. 1110 OF 2015 (F)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20-06-2015 IN AS NO. 67/2014 OF THE SUB COURT, KARUNAGAPPALLY
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15-10-2014 IN OS NO.30/2010 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, SASTHAMCOTTA.
APPELLANTS/ RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS:
1. RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI, FROM KRISHNA MANDIRAM TO CHAITHRAM, PANAPPETTI MURI, SASTHAMCOTTA VILLAGE.
2. NEETHA G.KURUP, W/O.RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI, FROM KRISHNA MANDIRAM TO CHAITHRAM, PANAPPETTI MURI, SASTHAMCOTTA VILLAGE.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.KRISHNANUNNI (SENIOR) SRI.VINOD RAVINDRANATH SRI.SAJU.S.A SMT.MEENA.A. SRI.K.C.KIRAN SRI.M.DEVESH
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:
1. JAYASREE, AGED 45 YEARS, W/O.SIVAN PILLAI, KUTTUNGAL PADINJATTATHIL, PANAPPETTI
MURI, SASTHAMCOTTA VILLAGE, KOLLAM, PIN-690 521.
2. SIVAN PILLAI, AGED 53 YEARS, KUTTUNGAL PADINJATTATHIL, PANAPPETTI MURI, SASTHAMCOTTA VILLAGE, KOLLAM, PIN-690 521.
R1,R2 BY ADVS. SRI.B.MOHANLAL SMT.P.S.PREETHA SRI.SAIJU S. SRI.T.PRASAD
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24-10-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
DST
K. HARILAL, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.S.A. No. 1110 of 2015
- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 24th day of October, 2016
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the appellants submits that he has no instruction from the party. It is presumed that appellants are not interested in prosecuting the matter.
Hence, this Second Appeal will stand dismissed
for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
K. HARILAL,
JUDGE
DST
//True copy//
P.A. To Judge
RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI
NEETHA G.KURUP
JAYASREE
SIVAN PILLAI
K. HARILAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
