Moidutty v. Viswanatha Menon &Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/2ND KARTHIKA, 1938
SA.NO. 416 OF 2002 (G)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23-08-2001 IN AS 7/1997 OF PRL.SUB COURT,IRINJALAKUDA
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11-10-1996 IN OS 270/1994 OF MUNSIFF COURT, KODUNGALLUR
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
MOIDUTTY, S/O. POKATTUTHODI MOIDEEN, PERINJANAM VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.K.G.BALASUBRAMANIAN
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
1. VISWANATHA MENON,
S/O. PINDIYATH PUTHEZHATH AMMINI AMMA, PERINJANAM VILLAGE AND DESOM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK. (DIED) LRS IMPLEADED
2. ABDUL RAHMAN S/O. POKATTUTHODI MOIDUTTY, PB.NO.12608, AL DHAID, SHARJAH, UAE.
3. ABDUL KARIM, S/O.NEDUMPARAMBIL KUNJUMOHAMMED, P.B.NO.4394, UNIVERSAL
VOLTAS, ABDUHABI UAE. (ADDL.R4 TO R7 ARE IMPLEADED).
*** ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS 4 TO 7:**
4. INDIRA VISWANATHA MENON,
5. ARUN, AGED 50 YEARS, D/O. VISWANATHA MENON, PERINJANAM VILLAGE AND DESOM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK.
6. SUSHMA, AGED 48 YEARS,D/O. VISWANATHA MENON, PERINJANAM VILLAGE AND DESOM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK.
SA.NO. 416 OF 2002 (G)
7. SANDHYA, AGED 42 YEARS,D/O. VISWANATHA MENON, PERINJANAM VILLAGE AND DESOM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK.
(LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED R1 ARE IMPLEADED AS ADDITIONAL R4 TO R7 AS PER ORDER ORDER DATED 19.02.2015 IN I.A. NO.3117/2014)
ADDLR4-R7 BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT
THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24-10-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
DST
K. HARILAL, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = S.A. No. 416 of 2002
- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 24th day of October, 2016
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the appellant submits
that the appellant is no more and the appeal is abated. In view of the above submission, this Second Appeal is dismissed as abated.
Sd/-
K. HARILAL,
JUDGE
DST
//True copy//
P.A. To Judge
Moiduttu
Viswanatha Menon
Abdul Rahman
K. Harilal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court