Civil Regular First Appeal No.500 of 2015 filed by appellants against a judgment and decree dated 31-05-2010 of the Sub Court, Thodupuzha. The appeal was not pressed by counsel and was dismissed accordingly.
Appeal dismissed as it was not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/15TH POUSHA, 1937
RFA.No. 500 of 2015
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS 61/2004 of SUB COURT, THODUPUZHA DATED 31-05-2010 AGAINST THE ORDER IN CMCP 48/2010 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 9.6.2010
APPELLANTS/ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS 2 TO 4:
BY ADVS.SRI.A.K.HARIDAS SRI.R.ANILKUMAR
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
NAVEEN GEORGE, S/O E.K.GEORGE, ELANJICKAL HOUSE, KOILKADAVU, SAHAYAGIRI PO KANTHALLOOR VILLAGE, DEVICOLAM TALUK. PIN 685 511.
R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.RAMAPRASAD UNNI. R1 BY ADV. SRI.ANIL K.NARENDRAN R1 BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC & A.HARIPRASAD, JJ.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
R.F.A.(Indigent) No.500 OF 2015
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 5th day of January, 2016
JUDGMENT
Antony Dominic, J.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter is
not pressed. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
SD/-
ANTONY DOMINIC
JUDGE
SD/-
A.HARIPRASAD
JUDGE
jes
DEEPTHI, W/O SUNNY T. JACOB
SILPA, D/O.SUNNY T.JACOB
SEETHA, D/O.SUNNY T. JACOB
NAVEEN GEORGE, S/O E.K.GEORGE
ANTONY DOMINIC
A.HARIPRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
