Ummayya v. Ashraf P.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought reimbursement of an amount deposited with the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal after it was set aside in a subsequent award. The Court held that since the liability was removed, the deposit holder must release the funds.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Manjeri to release the amount deposited by the petitioner within six weeks.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016/7TH BHADRA, 1938 OP (MAC).No. 88 of 2016 (O) ---------------------------OPMV 164/2010 of M.A.C.T., MANJERI ---------
PETITIONER(S)/2ND RESPONDENT:
UMMAYYA,W/O ALIKUTTY, AGED:55 YEARS, PUTHENVEETTIL HOUSE, VETTOM, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT
BY ADVS.SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL SRI.ANILKUMAR V. (VAZHARAMBIL) SMT.A.P.RUFAIJA
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER & OTHER RESPONDENTS:
1. ASHRAF P.P.
S/O MOHAMMED, AGED:36 YEARS, EDAMBATT HOUSE, PO.PULIKKAL, SIYAMKANDAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676637
2. ATTAKKOYATHANGAL
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to reimbursement of the amount deposited to contest ex parte proceedings before the Tribunal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ummayya
- respondent
The New India Assurance Company Limited
Coram
Shaji P. Chaly
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court