G.Chandrakumar v. Antony Chacko
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt case closed as the petitioner admitted compliance with prior WCOC judgment directions, rendering the case irrelevant to the court.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed; petitioner remains at liberty to challenge the underlying order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016/4TH BHADRA, 1938 Con.Case(C).No. 1373 of 2016 (S) -------------------------------
WP(C) 20513/2016, DATED 16-06-2016 ---------------
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN THE W.P.C.:
G.CHANDRAKUMAR, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O. GOPALAN, (PUMP OPERATOR, KSRTC, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CITY DEPOT), PLAN KUNNUVILA VEEDU, PAZHAYA UCHANKKADA, KAKKAVILA P.O., NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN- 695 506.
BY ADV. SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN
RESPONDENT(S)/1ST RESPONDENT IN THE W.P.C.: -------------------------------------------
ANTONY CHACKO, MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 023.
BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G. Chandra Kumar
- respondent
Antony Chacko
Coram
Shaji P. Chaly
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court