Abdul Nishad v. Marykutty Issac
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt matter, the petitioner withdrew the complaint stating that the court's prior directions had been complied with.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed.
In this contempt matter, the petitioner withdrew the complaint stating that the court's prior directions had been complied with.
Contempt case closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016/7TH BHADRA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1309 of 2016 ()
----------------------------------------------(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 21674/2016 DATED 01-07-2016)
PETITIONER/PETITIONER :
ABDUL NISHAD, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O. KHADER, MANGATTUVALAPPIL HOUSE, THRITHALA, PALAKKAD.
BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS :
1. SMT. MARYKUTTY ISSAC, DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD-678 001. (FATHERS NAME AND AGED IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER).
2. SHAJI JOSEPH,
DY. TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER AND MEMBER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD-678 001. (FATHERS NAME AND AGED IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
3. SREENIVASAN, DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF AND MEMBER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD-678 001. (FATHERS NAME AND AGED IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
4. SRI. SARAVANAN, SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD-678 001. (FATHERS NAME AND AGED IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.PAUL VARGHESE.M
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-08-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
COC.NO.1309/2016
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEX A1 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.21674/2016 DATED 01/07/2016.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
sts
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
COC No.1309 of 2016
Dated this the 29th day of August, 2016
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed complaining that the directions contained in the judgment in W.P.(C) No.21674/2016 dated 1.7.2016 is not complied with.
Contempt case is closed accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE
smv 29.08.2016
Abdul Nishad
Marykutty Isaac
Shaji Joseph
Sreenivasan
Sri. Saravanan
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court