The court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner, having aged beyond retirement age, no longer had any surviving claim for grade promotion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY 2016/1ST MAGHA, 1937
OP.No. 8373 of 2001 (V)
PETITIONER(S):
P.M CHANDRAN, DRIVER (HIGHER GRADE) DISTRICT PLANNING OFFICE, CIVIL STATION AYYANTHOLE P O, THRISSUR
BY ADV. SRI.V.P.SUKUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
R,R1 TO R3 BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI S JAMAL
THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J
O.P No.8373 of 2001
Dated this the 21st day of January, 2016
The above writ petition was filed in the year 2001, when
the petitioner was 51 years of age. The claim was for Grade promotion. The petitioner would have retired at the age of 55. Hence nothing survives in the writ petition. Writ petition is
dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
(K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE)
jma
//true copy//
P.A to Judge
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J
O.P No.8373 of 2001
J U D G M E N T
21st day of January, 2016
P.M Chandran
The Secretary, State Planning Board Thiruvananthapuram
The Secretary to Government, Planning and Economic Affairs (B) Department Thiruvananthapuram
The State of Kerala Represented by the Chief Secretary
K.Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
