Kamala Bai v. Sowdamini
Case brief
What is this about?
On admission of the civil petition, the petitioner filed a memo stating lack of interest as the matter was settled out of court; the court recorded the memo and dismissed the petition as not pressed.
What did the court decide?
Disposal of the civil petition by dismissal as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/28TH ASWINA, 1938 OP(C).No. 3226 of 2011 (O) --------------------------OS 98/2008 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, PALAKKAD ----------
PETITIONER(S):
KAMALA BAI, W/O.MAHALINGAM, POORNA CHANDRODAYA RICE MILL, KARUVAPPARA, KOZHINJAMPARA, AMSOM,KONGAD, PALAKKAD TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON
SRI.P.S.APPU SRI.C.A.ANOOP SRI.JIBU P THOMAS SRI.A.R.NIMOD
RESPONDENT(S):
1. SOWDAMINI, W/O.BHAVADAS.
2. SUMRESH BABU, S/O.BHAVADAS.
3. RAJEESH BABU, S/O.BHAVADAS RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT CHATHAMKULAM, VEEDU, KONGAD AMSOM,PALAKKAD TALUK-678 631.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kamala Bai
- respondent
Sowdamini
- respondent
Sumresh Babu
- respondent
Rajeesh Babu
- respondent
Sarada Rajashekharan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court