Dismissed
A.T.Sivaprasad v. Jose Mathew
Kerala HCOP(C)/2205/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/28TH ASWINA, 1938
OP(C).No. 2205 of 2016 (O)
--------------------------EP. NO.11/2015 IN O.S .NO.312/2010 OF MUNSIFF COURT, THIRUVALLA.
PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF/JUDGMENT DEBTOR.:
A.T. SIVAPRASAD, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O. THANKAPPAN PILLAI, ARAPPURAKKAL VEEDU, WEST OTHARA P.O., KUTTOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.K.N.RADHAKRISHNAN(THIRUVALLA).
RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS/DECREE HOLDER.:
1. JOSE MATHEW, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, HUSBAND OF SUSAN MATHEW, KOTTARAKKALATHIL VEEDU, WEST OTHARA P.O., KUTTOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK, REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER GEORGE, KOTTARAKKALATHIL VEEDU, WEST OTHARA P.O., KUTTOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK, PIN- 689 546.
2. SUSAN MATHEW, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, W/O. JOSE MATHEW. KOTTARAKKALATHIL VEEDU, WEST OTHARA P.O., KUTTOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK, REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER GEORGE, KOTTARAKKALATHIL VEEDU, WEST OTHARA P.O., KUTTOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK, PIN- 689 546.
3. GEORGE, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, KOTTARAKKALATHIL VEEDU, WEST OTHARA P.O., KUTTOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK, PIN- 689 546.
BY SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE.
ADVS. SRI.T.RAMPRASAD UNNI, SRI.S.M.PRASANTH, SMT.ASHA BABU, SMT.R.S.ASWINI SANKAR.
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-10-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
O.P.(C) No.2205 of 2016
Dated this the 20th day of October, 2016
JUDGMENT
When the petition came up for hearing today, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer in the petition has become infructuous. So the above submission is recorded and the petition is
dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- (K. Ramakrishnan, Judge)
//True Copy//
P.A. to Judge
ss
A.T. SIVAPRASAD
JOSE MATHEW
SUSAN MATHEW
GEORGE
K.RAMAKRISHNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court