V.v.Sunitha v. Addl.Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking directions to stop appointments and mandating hearing in pending disqualification proceedings, holding petitions should have challenged prior orders.
What did the court decide?
Original Petition dismissed. Petitioner directed to approach appropriate forum for grievances regarding management.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:-
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2016/2ND MAGHA, 1937
O.P.No.20069 of 2000 (L)
PETITIONER(S):-
V.V.SUNITHA, AGED 26, W/O.RAJENDRAN, NADUTHODY HOUSE, P.O.PULIKKAL, MALAPPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
RESPONDENT(S):-
- ADDITIONAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION (F) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
- THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KIZHISSERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
- THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MALAPPURAM.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking direction not to approve appointments and directing hearing in disqualification proceedings survives.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.V.Sunitha
- respondent
Additional Secretary to Government, General Education (F) Department, Government of Kerala
- respondent
The Assistant Educational Officer, Kizhissery
- respondent
The Deputy Director of Education, Malappuram
- respondent
V.V.Karthiyani Amma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court