The Income Tax Appeals were dismissed as infructuous because the Tribunal had recalled the impugned order on 30.11.2012.
Appeals dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE 2016/13TH JYAISHTA, 1938
ITA.No. 59 of 2012 ()
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 718/COCH/2010 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 25-08-2011
APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT/REVENUE:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALICUT
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/APPELLANT:
SHRI. JAFEES MOHAMMED
SAMAR, POOKOM, PANOOR, THALASSERY, KANNUR-670 101.
BY ADV. SRI. T.M. SREEDHARAN (SR.)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03-06-2016, ALONG WITH ITA. 72/2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC & DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JJ.
I.T.A. Nos. 59 & 72 of 2012
-----------------------------------------Dated this the 3rd day of June, 2016.
JUDGMENT
Antony Dominic,J.
In view of the order dated 30.11.2012 passed by the Tribunal recalling the impugned order, these appeals have become infructuous. Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed as infructuous.
Needless to say that it will be open to the Revenue to agitate
its contentions before the Tribunal.
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE.
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JUDGE.
Rv
W.P.(C.) No. -2-
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALICUT
SHRI. JAFEES MOHAMMED
ANTONY DOMINIC
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
