K.v.Mohammed Hilal v. Aziz
Case brief
What is this about?
This was a civil revision petition where the petitioner was absent. The High Court dismissed the revision due to default in appearance without substantive examination of the merits. The order was short and procedural.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
THURSDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE 2016/12TH JYAISHTA, 1938
CRP.No. 217 of 2009 ( )
----------------------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 50/2004 of WAKF TRIBUNAL, KOZHIKODE DATED 21-10-2008
REVISION PETITIONER(S)/3RD PLAINTIFF:
----------------------------------------------------------------K.V.MOHAMMED HILAL, VALIYAMANNIL HOUSE, P.O. ANAKKAYAM, ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.GANGESH (B/O)
RESPONDENT(S)/DEFENDANTS 2 TO 6 AND PLAINTIFFS 1 AND 2:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.V. MOHAMMED HILAL
- respondent
AZIZ
- respondent
KUNHATHUMMA
- respondent
PATHUMA
- respondent
ALAVI
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court