N.M.Sahajan v. Dr.Simon
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt case against a medical officer for alleged non-compliance with a direction to consider an application without a No Objection Certificate. The court held there was no deliberate contempt and closed the case.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:-
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/6TH KARTHIKA, 1938
Cont.Case(C).No.1686 of 2016 S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)No.23112/2016-L OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, DATED 12-08-2016
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION:-
N.M.SAHAJAN, S/O. NEELAMPILLY MADHAVAN, PROPRIETOR, SWASTHIK PRECURED SYSTEMS, DOOR NO.II/522, CHITTILAPPILLY P.O., THRISSUR-680 551.
BY ADVS.SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.R.ARUN KRISHNAN.
RESPONDENT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION:
DR.SIMON, [AGE AND FATHER'S NAME AND OTHER DETAILS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER], MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, ADAT, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 551.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether there was deliberate contempt by the respondent for not complying with the previous judgment.
Whether the respondent could comply by considering the application only with a No Objection Certificate from the Panchayat.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N.M. Sahajan
- respondent
Dr. Simon
Coram
K. Vinod Chandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court