Disposed

Anoop Kumar v. the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

Kerala HC7 Jan 2016WP(C)/113/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a clearance certificate for a vehicle operating on a valid route permit. Court ordered the respondent to grant the certificate without requiring surrender of the existing permit, provided dues are cleared, and directed a vehicle replacement plan within four months.

What did the court decide?

Order respondent to grant clearance certificate within two weeks without insisting on surrender of existing permit, provided dues are cleared, and specify a period not exceeding four months for vehicl

Anoop Kumar Vs the Secretary, Regional Transport… — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/17TH POUSHA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No. 113 of 2016 (L)

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

ANOOP KUMAR, S/O KRISHNAN, ITTITHARA HOUSE LOKAMALESWARAM KODUNGALLUR

¶8

BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON

¶9

RESPONDENT:

¶10

THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR

¶11

BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A.

¶12

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶13

WP(C).No. 113 of 2016 (L)

¶14

APPENDIX

¶15

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶16

EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE REGULAR STAGE CARRIAGE PERMIT ON THE ROUTE GURUVAYUR- ERNAKULAM ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER

¶17

EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE RC BOOK OF THE VEHICLE KL-47-3600

¶18

EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DT. 16/12/15

¶19

EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO. 6402/15 DT. 2/3/15

¶20

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL

/TRUE COPY/

P.A.TO JUDGE

DCS

V. CHITAMBARESH, J

¶25

W.P.(C). NO. 113 OF 2016

¶26

Dated this the 07^th day of January, 2016

¶27

JUDGMENT

¶28

The petitioner seeks clearance certificate in respect of his vehicle being operated on the basis of a valid route permit. Ext.P3 application put in by the petitioner in this regard shall be dealt with by the respondent within two weeks.

¶29

Such clearance certificate can be granted without insisting on the surrender of the existing regular permit in respect of the vehicle. It shall however be ensured that all dues to the Government including check reports and also to the Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund Board are satisfied.

¶30

The respondent shall also specify a period not exceeding four months within which the petitioner shall replace the vehicle on the route covered by the permit. This is because the vehicle now in use requires to be replaced by another to resume operations on the route covered by the permit.

¶31

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶32

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE

¶33

DCS

Anoop Kumar v. the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anoop Kumar v. the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Benny Davis Vs Premdas

N. Christu Das Vs the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

Ayshu Vs the Secretary,Regional Transport Authority Cum Regional Transport Officer

Moly Stephen (Mariyamma Stephen) Vs the Mulanthuruthy Grama Panchayath

Sudheer Vs the Secretary,Regional Transport Authority

Nithin S Vs the Kerala Univeristy of Health Science