In a contempt of court case (Con.Case(C).No. 1441 of 2016), the petitioner submitted that the panchayath had heard the petitioner. The court accepted this submission and closed the case, granting liberty to the petitioner to reopen if warranted.
The contempt case was closed with liberty to the petitioner to reopen if warranted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/25TH KARTHIKA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1441 of 2016 (S)
ORDER DATED 29-04-2016 IN WP(C) 16125/2016
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
SEBASTIAN MATTOM, S/O. AVARACHAN, AGED 56 YEARS, MANAGING PARTNER, M/S. MATTATHIL GRANITE METALS, KODASSERY, CHATTIKULAM P.O., THRISSUR - 680 721.
BY ADVS.SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA SRI.P.T.ABHILASH
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS 2 AND 1:
1. USHA SASEENDRAN, AGE AND NAME OF THE FATHER ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, FUNCTIONING AS PRESIDENT, KODASSERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH COMMITTEE, CHATTIKULAM P.O., THRISSUR - 680 721.
2. M.K. ANEES,
AGE AND NAME OF THE FATHER ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS SECRETARY, KODASSERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH COMMITTEE, CHATTIKULAM P.O., THRISSUR - 680 721.
BY ADV. SMT.I.SHEELA DEVI
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
msv/
Con.Case(C).No. 1441 of 2016 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURE
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.S.TO JUDGE
msv/
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
Cont. Case (C) No. 1441 of 2016
Dated this the 16th day of November, 2016
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the panchayath heard the petitioner. In that view of the matter, the contempt case is closed with liberty to the petitioner to reopen, if so warranted.
Sd/-
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE
bka/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt case against the petitioner should be closed given the panchayath had heard the petitioner.
SEBASTIAN MATTOM
USHA SASEENDRAN
M.K. ANEES
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
