to remit 25,000/-. Petitioner was exonerated from paying₹ balance amount as demanded in Ext.P1. The petitioner accepted this order of Joint Registrar by remitting 25,000/-. Having₹ accepted the order of the Joint Registrar by remitting the amount petitioner cannot now turn around to challenge Ext.P1. Petitioner is therefore, estopped from raising a challenge against Ext.P1 in the light of acceptance of Ext.P8 order. Main contention of the petitioner in this regard is based on Ext.P7 report of the enquiry officer that petitioner should be fully exonerated, I am of the view without reopening proceedings in Ext.P8 petitioner cannot raise such claim. In view of the concluded nature of Ext.P8 proceedings, the petitioner's challenge in this regard must fail. In so far as the second question raising a demand by the Secretary of the 1st respondent by Ext.P11 to pay the balance amount demanded in Ext.P1, this Court is of the view that without there being a challenge against Ext.P8, the demand now raised by Ext.P11 is legally unsustainable. The matter has been concluded by the enquiry of the Joint Registrar by Ext.P8. The validity of Ext.P8 is not called in question either by petitioner nor by the 1st respondent. In such circumstances, this Court is of the view that as the matter
