The Court closed a contempt case filed for non-compliance of directions in a backlog writ petition. It found that the respondent passed pending orders even though not in terms of the judgment, deciding no further action was necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016/8TH BHADRA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1228 of 2016 () IN WP(C).15073/2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 15073/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 15-04-2016
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
DR. KRISHNANKUTTY S/O.NEELAKANDAN, AGED 57 YEARS, ATHIRA,KARUNGANOOR P O, KOLLAM-691516, (RETIRED ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR IN ENGLISH S.N.COLLEGE, PUNALUR)
BY ADV. SRI.M.S.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT:
SHEIK PAREED AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADERSMT.C.S.SHEEJA
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-08-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 1228 of 2016 () IN WP(C).15073/2016
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 15.4.2016 IN W.P. (C)NO.15073/2016 ANNEXURE B: TRUE COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DATED 20.6.2016 RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A.TO JUDGE
dlk
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
C.O.(C). No.1228 of 2016
Dated this the 30th day of August, 2016
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed by the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.15073/2013 complaining that, directions contained in the
judgment is not complied with.
Contempt case is closed, accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY,JUDGE
dlk/30/8/
Dr. Krishnankutty
Sheik Pareed
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
