In this bail application arising out of a robbery charge under IPC Section 395, the single judge considered the propensity of the accused, who has six other crimes, alongside the modus operandi of the offense, and declined to grant bail, dismissing the petition.
The petitioner is not granted bail and the bail application is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY 2016/1ST MAGHA, 1937
Bail Appl..No. 8491 of 2015 ()
CRIME NO. 889/2015 OF VARANTHARAPPILLY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR.
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
AKHILNATH, AGED 23 YEARS, S/O. VISWANATHAN, MUTHALAKKULAM HOUSE, VADAKKUMURI DESOM, VARANTHARAPPILLY VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR), SRI.N.L.BITTO.
RESPONDENT/STATE OF KERALA:
THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARANTHARAPPILLY POLICE STATION, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.T.Y. LALIZA.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
SUNIL THOMAS, J.
B.A.No.8491 of 2015
Dated this the 21th day of January, 2016
ORDER
The petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.889/2015 of Varantharappilly Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 395 of IPC.
in custody since then. The learned Public Prosecutor on instructions submitted that the petitioner is involved in six other crimes.
B.A.No.8491 of 2015
2
am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
The bail application is accordingly dismissed.
Sd/- SUNIL THOMAS, JUDGE
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
AD
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the sole accused in a robbery case considering antecedents and modus operandi.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Akhilnath
State of Kerala
S. Thomas, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
