Aneesh v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY 2016/1ST MAGHA, 1937
Bail Appl..No. 48 of 2016 ()
CRIME NO. 336/2015 OF ARANMULA POLICE STATION , PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT
PETITIONER(S) :
1. ANEESH, AGED 24 YEARS,
2. RAVI, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.HASSAN KUNJU, RESIDING AT MURUPPEL,
3. SOJAN, AGED 33 YEARS, S/O.KANNAPPAN,
BY ADV. SRI.MANU RAMACHANDRAN
RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT/STATE:-
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHENGANOOR, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM - 682 031.
2. STATE OF KERALA,
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. R.REMA
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
SUNIL THOMAS, J.
B. A. No. 48 of 2016
Dated this the 21st day of January, 2016
O R D E R
When the matter was taken up, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioners are at present not arrayed as accused. The question about the identity of certain unidentified accused may come up. It is made clear that, in the eventuality of the presence of the petitioners are required, they may be issued with notice under Section 41 A of the Cr.P.C.
The bail application is closed, however, reserving the right of the petitioners to move this Court at appropriate stage, in the eventuality of they being arrayed as accused.
Sd/-
SUNIL THOMAS, JUDGE.
Pn
/True Copy/
P.A to Judge
Aneesh
Ravi
Sojan
State of Kerala
Sunil Thomas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court