Petitioner sought refund of balance transport fund amount. Court noted respondents admitted paying principal sum of ₹69,296. Writ petition closed on payment of principal; question of interest was not decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/9TH MAGHA, 1936
WP(C).No. 8293 of 2012 (J)
PETITIONER(S):
N.M.MOHANDASAN AGED 47 YEARS AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.MADHAVAN, NJATTUVETTY HOUSE PAZHUVIL WEST, KURUMBILAVU VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK THRISSUR DIST.
BY ADV. SRI.M.H.HANIL KUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
REVENUE RECOVERY, TALUK OFFICE, THRISSUR - 20.
RR4 BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER R BY SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 8293 of 2012
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT R2(A) : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 12.6.2012
// TRUE COPY //
P.A. TO JUDGE.
Sou.
A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
W.P(C) No.8293 of 2012
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 29th day of January, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court alleging that the
request made by him to respondents 2 and 3 to get refund of the balance amount on the basis of the final liability fixed on him did not invoke any positive response. The petitioner further alleges that respondents 2 and 3 were delaying the refund of the balance amount without assigning any valid reason.
submitted that as per the order dated 12.6.2012, a sum of ₹69,296/has been paid to the petitioner. Now the respondents 2 and 3 filed a statement showing the exact amount regarding the payment.
-:2:-
WP(C).8293/12
petitioner that there was willful laches on the part of the respondents in disbursing the amount, the learned standing counsel for the respondents submitted that the delay occurred was only because of administrative reasons. I see no reason to disbelieve the said submission.
Therefore, the writ petition is closed as the principal
amount has already been disbursed to the petitioner.
Sd/-
A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE
krj
N.M.Mohandas
State of Kerala Represented by Secretary, Motor Transport Department
Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund Represented by its Chairman
District Executive Officer Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund
District Collector Thirssur
A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
