It is disclosed that a Writ Petition filed by Pramodkumar.N against the Regional Transport Officer Ernakulam had been finally heard on 01-06-2015. The Court held that considering the nature of reliefs sought, the matter had become infructuous and dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2015/11TH JYAISHTA, 1937
WP(C).No. 5428 of 2012 (C)
PETITIONER:
PRAMODKUMAR.N AGED 40 YEARS SREE VILAS, WEST VELIYATHUNADU, P.O.ALANGAD. BY ADVS.SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR SMT.G.CHITRA
RESPONDENT:
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER ERNAKULAM. PIN -682 030.
R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LILLY K.T.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
01-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
JUDGMENT
Considering the nature of the reliefs sought for in the writ
petition, I am of the view that the matter has become infructuous.
Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE
sm/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition, considering the nature of reliefs sought and circumstances, had become infructuous warranting dismissal.
PRAMODKUMAR.N AGED 40 YEARS SREE VILAS
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER ERNAKULAM
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
