Sindhu K.K. v. Aparna .T
Case brief
What is this about?
Review petition filed by a school assistant before the High Court of Kerala was closed upon the court noting a subsequent order passed by the Director of Public Instructions, with liberty to challenge that order.
What did the court decide?
none
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2015/11TH JYAISHTA, 1937
RP.No. 232 of 2015
WP(C) 357/2014, DATED 04-02-2015
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/5TH RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION:
SINDHU K.K., UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, CHETTIATH UP SCHOOL, PURUPPANAM PO, VADAKARA KOZHIKODE.
BY ADVS.SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.)
SRI.S.SUJIN
RESPONDENTS IN RP/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1,2, 3, 4 & 6 IN WRIT PETITION:
1. APARNA .T, LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, CHETTIATH UP SCHOOL, PUDUPPANAM PO, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE-673110.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SINDHU K.K.
- respondent
APARNA .T
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION
- respondent
ASSISTANT EDUCATION OFFICER
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court