P.R.Mohan v. Najuma
Case brief
What is this about?
The respondent submitted that directions were complied with; the contempt case was closed. The court ordered the respondent to provide a sketch of the inspected property to the petitioner upon request and payment of the requisite fee.
What did the court decide?
Respondent to provide sketch of property based on inspection upon petitioner's request and payment of fee; case closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2015/11TH JYAISHTA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 452 of 2015 (S)
-------------------------------------------------(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 2272/2014 DATED 28-08-2014)
PETITIONER/WRIT PETITIONER :
P.R.MOHAN, AGED 67 YEARS, S/O.(LATE). P. NARAYANA PANIKKAR, 'PARAPPIL' HOUSE, KUNNAKKAL (P.O), VALAKAM, MUVATTUPUZHA 682 316
BY ADV. SRI.JESWIN P.VARGHESE
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.1 :
NAJUMA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME (NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) TALUK SURVEYOR, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM, PIN -682 011
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.R.MOHAN
- respondent
NAJUMA
Coram
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court