Samu M.A v. Southern Railway
Case brief
What is this about?
In this writ petition, the Court posted the matter for orders without examining the merits due to the petitioners' absence and lack of representation before closing the petition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/10TH MAGHA, 1936
WP(C).No. 10237 of 2012 (D)
PETITIONERS:
1. SAMU M.A ., AGED 55 YEARS, S/O. KURUMBAN KUNJAAYYAPPAN, MADATHAZHATH HOUSE, THAYIKKATTUKARA, AMBATTUKAVU, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
2. AISWARYA ADVERTISING INDUSTRIES, 2ND FLOOR, CARMEL BUILDING, BANERJI ROAD, KOCHI-18 REPRESENTED BY MANAGING PARTNER K.VIJAYAKUMAR.
BY ADVS.SRI.ALEXANDER GEORGE SRI.J.ABHILASH
RESPONDENTS:
1. SOUTHERN RAILWAY, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, THYCADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Samu M.A.
- petitioner
Aiswarya Advertising Industries
- respondent
Southern Railway
- respondent
Senior Section Engineer, PWAY Southern Railway, Aluva
- respondent
Choorinikara Gramapanchayath
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court