This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/15TH KARTHIKA, 1937
RSA.No. 708 of 2012 ()
A.S.No.314 OF 2008 OF THE COURT OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, PALAKKAD.
O.S.No. 289 OF 2006 OF THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, PALAKKAD
APPELLANTS/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
VISWANATHAN K.A., S/O.LATE APPU, KADAMPADI HOUSE, DHONI P.O., NEAR DHONI FARM, PUDUPARIYARAM AMSOM, PALAKKAD TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K. SRI.LIJU. M.P
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
RAMAKRISHNAN K.A., S/O.LATE APPU, KADAMPADI HOUSE, MUTTIKULANGARA, MUTTIKULANGARA P.O., PUDUPARIYARAM AMSOM, PALAKKAD TALUK - 678 594
BY ADVS. SRI.T.M.SUNIL
SMT.S.CHITHRA
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-112015, ALONG WITH RSA. 710/2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
skr
P.B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
== == == == == == == == == == ==
== == == == == == == == == == == Dated this the 6th day of November, 2015
The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a
memo stating the appeal is not pressed. In the light of the memo filed by the learned counsel for the appellant
the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/P.B. SURESH KUMAR JUDGE
skr
//True copy//
PA to Judge
VISWANATHAN K.A.
RAMAKRISHNAN K.A.
P.B.SURESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
