Dismissed
Jayakumari v. Purushothaman Nair
Kerala HCRSA/593/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/15TH KARTHIKA, 1937
RSA.No. 593 of 2010 (D)
A.S.No. 64/2002 of THE COURT OF SUB JUDGE, ATTINGAL
O.S.No. 404/1997 of THE COURT OF MUNSIFF, ATTINGAL
APPELLANT/2nd APPELLANT/2nd DEFENDANT:
JAYAKUMARI, AGED 42 YEARS, D/O.RAMAN PILLAI, ASWATHY BHAVAN, THEKKEVILA MURI, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.MUHAMMED
SRI.S.VIJI
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
PURUSHOTHAMAN NAIR, S/O.BHARGAVAN PILLAI, PANAYIL PUTHEN VEEDU, THEKKEVILA MURI, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.P.JAYAKUMAR(CAVEATOR)
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-112015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
skr
P.B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
== == == == == == == == == == == R.S.A. No. 593 of 2010
== == == == == == == == == == == Dated this the 6th day of November, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that
the matter is settled between the parties out of court.
In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the second appeal is dismissed as settled out of court. The registry is directed to transmit back the lower court records forthwith.
P.B. SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE
skr
JAYAKUMARI
PURUSHOTHAMAN NAIR
P.B. SURESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court