George Thomas v. Marykutty Varghese
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed the regular second appeal as not pressed, despite it being heard on 04-11-2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/13TH KARTHIKA, 1937
RSA.No. 279 of 2012 ()
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS. NO.156/2008 OF DISTRICT COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA DATED 01-09-2011. AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS. NO.271/2005 OF MUNSIFF COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA DATED 19-09-2008.
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS :
1. GEORGE THOMAS, EETTIMOOTTIL HOUSE, KIZHAVALLOOR, PRAMADOM VILLAGE, NOW RESIDING AT 1148, HAIVEY, R.R.I., BOX 1091 BRD, STOOD BURG, P.A.18360-9723 US.
2. LILLY MARVA @ LEELAMMA, -DO-, NOW RESIDING AT 82-19-62 AVE, MIDDLE VILLAGE, NEW YORK, 11379, USA.
3. JOSE THOMAS, -DO-, NOW RESIDING AT 48 QUENNES AVE, ELMONT, YORK 11003, USA.
4. SHERLY THOMAS, MANNIL HOUSE, THANNITHODU VILLAGE, NOW RESIDING AT -DO- -DO-.
5. SHYNI, -DO- -DO-
6. SHIJA DAVID, -DO- -DO-
7. KUNJAMMA OOMEN, PEEDIKAYIL HOUSE, VAKAYAR, PRAMADOM VILLAGE.
8. SOMINI BABY, BARBARA STREET, ELMONT, NEW YORK-11003.
9. THANKAMMA, -DO- -DO-.
(APPELLANTS 1 TO 6, 8 & 9 REPRESENTED BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER KUNJAMMA OOMEN 7TH APPELLANT).
BY ADV. SRI.G.UNNIKRISHNAN.
RSA.No. 279 of 2012
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
MARYKUTTY VARGHESE @ MARY, EETTIMOOTTIL HOUSE, KIZHAVALLOOR, PRAMADOM VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERY, NOW RESIDING AT 77-48, 252 STREET, BELLEROS, NEW YORK-11426, USA.
BY ADVS. SRI.KISHOR B., SRI.TOMS MATHEW.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = R.S.A.No.279 of 2012.
= = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 4th day of November, 2015.
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the appellants submits
that the second appeal is not pressed. In the light of the
above submission made by the learned counsel for the appellants, the second appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR,
JUDGE.
Kvs/-
// True copy //
P.A. TO JUDGE.
George Thomas
Marykutty Varghese
P.B.Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court