The petitioner in the review petition is the 6th respondent in the writ petition that was disposed by judgment dated 29.05.2015. By the said judgment, this Court had disposed the writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 revision, that was preferred by the writ petitioner, after hearing the writ petitioner, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of that judgment. It was also made clear that till such time as orders are passed by the 1st respondent, as directed in the judgment, and communicated to the writ petitioner, the writ petitioner would be permitted to continue as the Head Mistress in the School. The review petition has been filed by the 6th respondent in the writ petition, stating that, inasmuch as he has objections to the grant of approval to the appointment of the writ petitioner as the Head Mistress of the School, it is only appropriate that while passing orders on Ext.P6 revision petition preferred by the writ petitioner, the review petitioner also be heard by the 1st respondent. He would point out that he has already preferred Annexure 10 objection before the 1st respondent and hence, the 1st respondent should be directed to consider the said objections and
