A contempt case where the petitioner submitted that the court's directions in a connected writ petition were complied with, resulting in the closure of the matter.
The contempt case is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/15TH JYAISHTA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 647 of 2015 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.26215/2013, DATED 23-02-2015
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER :
RADHIKA M., AGED 39 YEARS, W/O.MURALEEDHARAN, ASSISTANT FINANCE OFFICER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, GENERATION CIRCLE, THRISSUR.
BY DR.K.P.SATHEESAN (SENIOR ADVOCATE) ADVS. SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) SRI.ANOOP.V.NAIR SRI.S.VIBHEESHANAN
RESPONDENT(S)/3RD RESPONDENT :
MR.R.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR, AGED 52 YEARS (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) SECRETARY AND CONVENER, DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE (HIGHER) FOR ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICERS, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 004.
BY ADV. SRI.K.S.ANIL, S.C
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
Con.Case(C).No. 647 of 2015 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE 1: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 23.02.2015 IN W.P.(C).NO.26215/2013.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES :
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A.TO JUDGE.
Msd.
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
Cont.Case(C) No.647 of 2015
Dated this the 5th day of June, 2015
J U D G M E N T
It is submitted that, the direction of this Court has already
been complied with.
In view of the above, this contempt case is closed.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE.
AV
RADHIKA M.
MR.R.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
