Sajeena v. Smt. Nijamol
Case brief
What is this about?
This court disposed of a contempt petition filed against the Local Level Monitoring Committee for issuing an order contradicting court directions. The court held that the committee's finding that the land remained fit for agricultural purposes negated the procedural irregularity cited, dismissing the contempt charge and closing the case.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed; the petitioner is free to challenge the order in accordance with law or apply under the Act 28 of 2008.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/14TH JYAISHTA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 23 of 2015 (S)
WP(C) 22749/2013 of THIS HONOURABLE COURT
PETITIONER/PETITIONER :
------------------------------------
SAJEENA, AGED 39 YEARS, W/O.MOHAMMED IQBAL, OORATHODIYIL HOUSE, PARUDUR, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679305.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN
SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA SRI.O.K.MURALEEDHARAN
RESPONDENT/ADDITIONAL 6TH RESPONDENT :
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether contempt is attracted when the Local Level Monitoring Committee states it has no power to correct a draft data bank but acts on the finding that the land fits agricultural purposes under the A
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SAJEENA
- respondent
SMT. NIJAMOL
- respondent
V.P. VASUDEVAN
- respondent
BAVA
- respondent
RAMADAS PARUDUR
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court