Dismissed

Sobha.K v. Mr.T.Balakrishnan

Kerala HC5 Jun 2015Con.Case(C)/107/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a contempt petition regarding an order permitting the petitioner to continue as a sweepers/peon for four weeks. The Court closed the case based on the respondent Bank's submission that another employee was appointed after the interim order was passed, negating the continuation of contempt. The Appendix details the petitioner's annexures.

What did the court decide?

The contempt case was closed with no order made.

Sobha.K Vs Mr.T.Balakrishnan — Contempt of Court | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/15TH JYAISHTA, 1937

¶5

Con.Case(C).No. 107 of 2015 (S)

¶6

WP(C) 1414/2015 of THIS HONOURABLE COURT

¶7

PETITIONER :

¶8

------------------

¶9

SOBHA.K., AGED 37 YEARS, W/O.JAYAPRAKASH, GOURI SHANKARAM, KIZHAKKANCHERRY, PALAKKAD-678 684.

¶10

BY ADVS.SRI.SIVAN MADATHIL SMT.P.USHAKUMARI

¶11

RESPONDENTS :

¶12

----------------------

¶13

1. MR.T.BALAKRISHNAN (NAME OF FATHER (NOT KNOWN), REGIONAL MANAGER, BANK OF BARODA, REGIONAL OFFICE, VASUDEVA BUIDLING, T.D.ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 011.

¶14

2. MR.M.RAVEENDRAN, AGED 59 YEARS, NAME OF FATHER (NOT KNOWN), BANK OF BARODA, (VADAKKENCHERRY BRANCH), 1ST FLOOR MANNARKKUDY BUILDING, TRICHUR ROAD, PALAKKAD-678 683.

¶15

BY SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

¶16

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30-03-2015, THE COURT ON 05-06-2015 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶17

¶18

Con.Case(C).No. 107 of 2015 (S)

¶19

APPENDIX

¶20

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :

¶21

ANNEXURE A1: ORDER OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DT 16/1/2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1414/2015.

¶22

RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES : NIL.

//TRUE COPY//

P.A. TO JUDGE

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

¶27

*******************************************************

¶28

Contempt Case (C)No.107 of 2015

¶29

******************************************************* Dated this the 5^th day of June, 2015

¶30

JUDGMENT

¶31

This contempt petition arises from the interim order dated

¶32

16.1.2015 in W.P.(C) No.1414/2015. This interim order was passed on 16.12015. The above interim order is as follows:

¶33

“Admit. Learned Standing Counsel takes notice

¶34

for the respondents.

¶35

There shall be an interim order to the effect that if the petitioner is continuing in the post of Sweeper/Peon, she shall be permitted to continue for a period of four weeks.

¶36

Post on 23.1.2015.”

¶37

It is submitted by the respondent Bank that they appointed one Nimisha in the Bank on 12.1.2015. In that view of the matter, no

¶38

contempt is made out and this Contempt Case is closed.

¶39

Sd/-

¶40

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE

¶41

Sobha.K v. Mr.T.Balakrishnan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sobha.K v. Mr.T.Balakrishnan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sajeena Vs Smt. Nijamol

S.A Shaik Muhammed Shabeer Vs K.K Ibrahimkutty

Faras Info-Tech Private Limited Vs the Asst. Commissioner (Assessment)

Anil S Uzhathil Vs Tinku Biswal

Bharathiya Pattikajana Samajam Vs Sri. E.K.Majhi

Radhika M. Vs Mr.R.Rajasekharan Nair