Dr P Remadevi v. Dr.Shylaja K Nair
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt of court case where the judge closed the proceeding due to the lack of any representations filed by the parties after admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
THURSDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/28TH JYAISHTA, 1937
Con.Case (C).No. 412 of 2015 (S)
ORDER DATED 18-02-2015 IN WP(C) 25180/2014.
PETITIONER/5TH RESPONDENT:
DR.P. REMADEVI,PRINCIPAL SHREE VIDYADHIRAJA HOMEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE,NEMOM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695020.
BY ADVS.SRI.ABRAHAM SAMSON SMT.LOVELY SAMSON
RESPONDENT/PETITONER:
DR.SHYLAJA K NAIR,AGED 55 YEARS,W/O.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR, RESIDING AT 'SREE VINAYAKOM',T.C.54/165-2, PRA 118A,PAPPANAMCODE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, NOW TEMPORARILY EXERCISING THE DUTIES OF DRAWING & DISBURSING OFFICER, SHREE VIDYADHIRAJA HOMEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE, NEMOM P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 020.
BY SRI.S.PRASANTH (AYYAPPANKAVU)
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
pk
Con.Case (C).No. 412 of 2015 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A:CERTIRFIED COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 18.2.2015 IN W.P(C) NO.25180/2014.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.S. TO JUDGE
pk
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
*******************************************************
Contempt Case (C) No.412 of 2015
******************************************************* Dated this the 18th day of June, 2015
JUDGMENT
No representation, the Contempt Case is closed.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
ln
/True copy/
P.A. to Judge
Dr. P. Remadevi
Dr. Shylaja K Nair
A.Muhamad Mustaque
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court