Disposed

Joshy v. Federal Bank Ltd.

Kerala HC17 Jun 2015OP (DRT)/44/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioners, who paid certain amounts towards the borrower's liability based on DRT directions, approached the court to discharge the entire liability of the borrower and withdraw a pending application, subject to specific repayment terms and conditions imposed by the court.

What did the court decide?

Loan liability discharged on terms: payment of Rs.50,000 immediately, followed by six installments starting 20.07.2015; withdrawal of prior proceedings before DRT within two weeks; no refund of paymen

Joshy Vs Federal Bank Ltd. — Banking and Recovery | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/27TH JYAISHTA, 1937

¶5

OP (DRT).No. 44 of 2015 (O)

¶6

S.A.No.193/2012 DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM

¶7

PETITIONERS :-

¶8

1. JOSHY, S/O. JOSEPH, PUTHENPURACKAL HOUSE @ EROORICKAL, KADANADU P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.

¶9

2. RENIL, S/O. FRANCIS, PARACKAL @ EDAMULAYIL, PIZHAKU P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.

¶10

3. SUNNY ANDREWS, S/O. ANDREWS, MADHURAMCHERI HOUSE, KADANADU P.O., KOTTAYAM.

¶11

BY ADV. SMT.A.SREEKALA

¶12

RESPONDENTS :-

¶13

1. FEDERAL BANK, STRESSED ASSET MANAGEMENT CELL,

¶14

THEKKUMKAL BUILDING T.B.ROAD, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686 001.

¶15

2. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER,

¶16

FEDERAL BANK, STRESSED ASSET MANAGEMENT CELL, THEKKUMKAL BUILDING, T.B.ROAD, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686 001.

¶17

3. P.M.JAYACHANDRAN, PUTHENPURACKAL HOUSE, ANTHINADU P.O., KOTTAYAM - 686 009.

¶18

4. THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM - 682 017.

¶19

R2 BY ADVS. SRI.A.ANTONY SMT.LEELAMMA ANTONY

¶20

THIS OP (DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶21

rkj

¶22

OP (DRT).No.44 of 2015 (O)

¶23

APPENDIX

¶24

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :-

¶25

EXHIBIT P1 :- TRUE COPY OF S.A.NO.193/2012 FILED BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

¶26

EXHIBIT P2 :- TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DTD.02.12.2014 ISSUED BY THE COMMISSIONER.

¶27

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :- NIL

rkj

//TRUE COPY//

P.A. TO JUDGE

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J

¶32

------------------------------------------------------------

¶33

O.P.(DRT)No.44 of 2015

¶34

------------------------------------------------------------

¶35

Dated this the 17^th day of June, 2015

¶36

JUDGMENT

¶37

The petitioners appears to be a purchaser from the borrower of the lending institution. The third respondent is the borrower. The petitioners impugns SARFAESI proceedings before this Court. The petitioners approached DRT by filing S.A. No.193/2012. The petitioners it seems have paid certain amount based on the direction of the DRT. However, they have not fully honoured the directions. Threatened with the dispossession, petitioners have approached this Court. The petitioners submits that they are prepared to discharge the entire liability owed by the borrower. The petitioners also undertake to withdraw S.A. No.193/2012 before the DRT.

¶38

The learned counsel for the bank opposes the prayer sought by the petitioners and submits that the petitioners have no locus standi to file the petition.

¶39

O.P.(DRT)No.44 of 2015

¶40

¶41

When a person making a conscious payment on behalf of the third person, that person cannot claim that it is payment under mistake. Therefore, taking note of the facts that the petitioners have already paid certain amount based on the direction of the DRT, I am of the view that the petitioners may be permitted to discharge the entire liability of the borrower on following terms and conditions;

¶42

i) The petitioners shall not claim any refund from the bank for any payment effected to the bank on behalf of borrower.

¶43

ii) The petitioners shall withdraw S.A.No.193/2012 within two weeks from today and necessary memo shall be filed before the DRT.

¶44

iii) The petitioners shall remit Rs.50,000/- on or before 29.06.2015. Thereafter, pay the entire balance in six installments starting from 20.07.2015.

¶45

iv) If the petitioners commits default in making anyone

¶46

of the installments, the bank is at liberty to proceed against him.

¶47

Therefore, this petition is disposed of.

¶48

Sd/-

¶49

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE

¶50

rkj

¶51

//TRUE COPY//

¶52

P.A. TO JUDGE

Joshy v. Federal Bank Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Joshy v. Federal Bank Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gangadharan Vs P.M.Jaya

C. Sharafudheen Vs Rto,Malappuram

Biju Varghese Vs Recovery Officer

K C Mathai Vs Chief Manager

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs Shaju Mathew

Remambika Vs the District Collector, Kozhikode.