This contempt case had been filed for non-compliance of a previous judgment initiating proceedings under Section 52(A) of the Wakf Act. The court observed that the petitioner was told to complain to the wrong authority, and since the directions were complied with, the case was closed.
The contempt court case is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2015/31ST ASHADHA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 266 of 2015 (S)
(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 10177/2013 DATED 05-11-2014)
PETITIONER/PETITIONER :
V.P.ALIYAMUTTY, AGED 61 YEARS, S/O.MOHAMMED, RESIDING AT VALIYAPARAMBIL HOUSE, P.O.VADAKKUMPURAM, VALANCHERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN SRI.P.A.HARISH
RESPONDENT/5TH RESPONDENT :
B.MOHAMMED JAMAL,
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KERALA STATE WAQF BOARD, VIP ROAD, KOCHI-682 310
BY ADV. SRI.K.SHIBILI NAHA
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
COC.NO.266/2015
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
| ANNEX A | COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 18/3/2014 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT |
|---|---|
| ANNEX B | COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE ADMINISTRATOR STATE WAQF BOARD DATED 5/4/2014. |
| ANNEX C | CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.10177/2013 DATED 5/11/2014. |
| ANNEX D | COPY OF THE FORWARDING LETTER DATED 15/11/2014 |
| ANNEX E | COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 19/1/2015. |
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
sts
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
Contempt Case (C). No. 266 of 2015 ------------------------------------------Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2015
J U D G M E N T
Pursuant to judgment of this court in WP(C) No.10177/2013, proceedings have been initiated under Section 52(A) of the WAKF Act.
Sd/-
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE.
Pn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt proceedings initiated for non-compliance of directions can be closed despite the complaint being filed before the wrong authority.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V.P.ALIYAMUTTY
B.MOHAMMED JAMAL
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
