Aleyachan P.V. v. U.v.Jose
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt of court case, the petitioner submitted that prior court directions had been complied with. Consequently, the court closed the case on the same day it was admitted.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JULY 2015/30TH ASHADHA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 781 of 2015 (S)
JUDGMENT DATED 16.12.2014 IN WP(C) 32769/2014
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
ALEYACHAN P.V., AGED 51 YEARS SON OF VARKEY, PULIYANAKUNNEL, PERUVA, KOTTAYAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.SAJI KURIACHAN
SRI.M.R.NANDAKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:
-------------------------------------------------
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Aleyachan P.V.
- respondent
U.V.Jose
- respondent
T.V.Subhash
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court