Petitioners challenged an order of the District Registrar under a Contempt of Court petition. The Court examined the order and found it in compliance with the previous judgment, thereby closing the Contempt Case.
Contempt case closed; order of the District Registrar held to be in compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2015/31ST ASHADHA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 1056 of 2015 ()
-------------------------------------------------(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 12800/2011 DATED 31/07/2014)
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
1. UDAYAN, AGED 59 YEARS, S/O.SREEDHARAN, THOPPIL HOUSE, EROOR P.O., THRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN -682 306
2. JAYAN V.V., AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.V.R VISWAMBHARAN, VADAKKUMPURATH HOUSE, EROOR P.O., THRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN -682 306
BY ADV. SRI.B.S.SURESH KUMAR
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT :
MR.K.KRISHNAN, AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN, THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, CHEMBUKAVU , THRISSUR -680 001
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.T.SHEEBA
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
COC.NO.1056/2015
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEX 1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 31/07/2014 PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WP(C).NO.12800/2011. ANNEX II COPY OF THE ORDER NO.M2/1651/TRISSUR DATED 21/02/2015 BY OFFICE OF TRISSUR DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL)
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
sts
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
***************************************************************************** Contempt of Court Case (C) No.1056 of 2015
Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2015
JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the judgment of this Court in W.P.(C) No.12800/2011, an order has been passed on 21.2.2015. The petitioner submits that the judgment is not in consonance with the directions of this Court. In fact, this Court had only directed the respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner.
In that view of the matter, this Court is of the view that the order is produced as Annexure-2, is in compliance with the judgment and this Contempt Case is closed.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
ln
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the order dated 21.2.2015 by the District Registrar complies with the directions in W.P.(C) No. 12800/2011
Whether to dismiss the present Contempt of Court case
Udayan
Jayan V.V.
Mr. K. Krishnan
A.Muhammed Mustaque
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
