Dismissed
Aby David v. Padmini M.R
Kerala HCWP(C)/34/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioners filed a writ petition which was heard on the same day. Counsel submitted the matter had become infructuous, and the court dismissed the petition accordingly.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT:
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
¶4
TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2014/18TH AGRAHAYANA, 1936
¶5
WP(C).No. 34 of 2014 (D) -------------------------
¶6
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
¶7
- ABY DAVID, S/O.T P DAVID, ABY'S COTTAGE, PALLIKKAL P O, KATTANAM, KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA DIST
¶8
- RAJAN VARGHESE, S/O.VARGHESE , SANTHOME, PALLIKKAL P O, KATTANAM, KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA DIST
¶9
- T O MADHAVAN, S/O.MATHAN, M R R NIVAS, VETTICODE P O VETTICODE, P O, VETTICODE ALAPPUZHA DIST
¶10
- CHERIAN CHACKO, KATTOORKALEEKAL HOUSE, PALLIKKAL P O, KATTANAM KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA DIST 5. JOHN MATHEW, S/O.JOHN, SIBY VILLA, BHARANICKAVU SOUTH PALLIKKAL P O, KATTANAM, KAYAMKULAM ALAPPUZHA DIST 6. BABU THOMAS, S/O.YOHANNAN THOMAS, KARIPALLIL THOMAS COTTAGE, PALLIKKAL PO, KATTANAM, KAYAMKULAM ALAPPUZHA DIST
¶11
- STEPHEN JOSEPH THOTTUNKAL HOUSE, VETTICODE P O, PALLIKKAL KATTANAM, ALAPPUZHA DIST BY ADVS.SRI.GOPAKUMAR R.THALIYAL SRI.A.CHANDRA BABU
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
ABY DAVID
- petitioner
RAJAN VARGHESE
- petitioner
T O MADHAVAN
- respondent
PADMINI M.R
- respondent
BHARANIKKAVU GRAMA PANCHAYATH
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court