This is a one-line order dismissing a review petition. The court found that the prior judgment recorded an undertaking by the Government Pleader and noted that the revision was to be considered under a specific Circular, leaving nothing to review.
The review petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2014/18TH CHAITHRA, 1936 RP.No. 285 of 2014 () IN WP(C).31527/2013
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 31527/2013 DATED 03-01-2014
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
K.P.SANTHOSHKUMAR,
POLAKKUTTU HOUSE, RAMANATTUKARA, KOZHIKODE.
BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
THE SECRETARY,
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CUM REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, KOZHIKODE-673020.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. NOUSHAD THOTTATHIL
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-04-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
DSV/16/04
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
R.P.No. 285 of 2014
in W.P.(C) No. 31527 of 2013
Dated this the 8th day of April, 2014
O R D E R
The judgment only recorded the undertaking of the Government Pleader that the revision would be considered on the strength of the Circular No.D3/875/STA/2005. In the said circumstance, there
can be no review of the aforesaid judgment.
The review petition is dismissed.
Sd/-
K. VINOD CHANDRAN JUDGE
// True Copy //
P.A. To Judge
DSV/08/04
K.P.SanthosHKumar
The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority Cum Regional Transport Officer, Kozhikode
K.Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
