The High Court at Ernakulam dismissed a writ petition filed by S. Biju against the Employees' Provident Fund Commissioner by way of default due to lack of representation during hearing.
The writ petition was dismissed on default due to lack of representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL 2014/17TH CHAITHRA, 1936
WP(C).No. 1715 of 2010 (L)
PETITIONER(S):
S.BIJU, S/O.SADANANDAN, AGED 26 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, M/S.KAIRALI CASHEWS THOTTATHIL VEEDU, THAZHAMEL, ANCHAL P.O. KOLLAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.SAIJU S.
SRI.GIREESH PANKAJAKSHAN
RESPONDENT(S):
BY ADV. SRI.V.V.SURESH,SC,EPF.ORGANISATION
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-04-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J
JUDGMENT
When the case was called, there was no
representation.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for
default.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, Judge
Mrcs
//True Copy//
S. Biju
The Employees' Provident Fund Commissioner
K. Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
