S.Vinod v. the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioner when the matter was listed for hearing. No substantive issues were discussed.
The writ petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioner when the matter was listed for hearing. No substantive issues were discussed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL 2014/17TH CHAITHRA, 1936
WP(C).No. 261 of 2010 (G)
PETITIONER(S):
S.VINOD, MANAGER, KARUNA CENTRAL SCHOOL, KALLUVATHUKKAL, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.S.SANTHOSH KUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
WP(C).No. 261 of 2010
-2-
BY ADV. SRI.K.ABDUL JAWAD BY . SRI.S.SUNIL NARAYANAN BY SRI.SAJJU.S BY SRI.V.V.SURESH,SC,EPF.ORGANISATION
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-04-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J
JUDGMENT
When the case was called, there was no
representation.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for
default.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, Judge
Mrcs
S.Vinod
The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner
The Recovery Officer
Narmada
Niji C.S.
K.Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court