Raju v. Anto Paul
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought to receive a witness list and documents produced belatedly. The High Court allowed the petitions on condition that the petitioner pays Rs. 750 to the respondents as costs for the delay.
What did the court decide?
The petitions for reception of witness list and documents stand allowed on condition that the petitioner pays Rs. 750 to the respondents.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN
MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY 2014/30TH POUSHA, 1935
OP(C).No. 4373 of 2013 (O)
O.S. NO.453/2011 OF MUNSIFF COURT, WADAKKANCHERRY
PETITIONER:
RAJU AGED 48 YEARS
S/O.ANTONY, KOLLANNOOR HOUSE, CHIRANELLOOR P.O. KECHERI, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT- 680501.
BY ADV. SRI.P.RAMACHANDRAN
RESPONDENTS:
1. ANTO PAUL, AGED 46 YEARS S/O.VAZHAPPILLY PAUL, VAZHAPPILLY HOUSE CHIRANELLOOR P.O., KECHERI, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680501.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether witness list and documents filed belatedly should be admitted to prevent injustice.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raju
- respondent
Anto Paul
- respondent
Advocate Premji Paul
- respondent
Rosa
- respondent
Biju
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court