K.v.Shukoor v. K.P.Muhammed
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought to set aside orders dismissing applications to implead assignees in a specific performance suit. The court allowed the petition conditionally, permitting impleadment only upon payment of costs.
What did the court decide?
Set aside suits orders; allow impleadment and amendment on condition of Rs.2,000 cost payment.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN
MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY 2014/30TH POUSHA, 1935
OP(C).No. 9 of 2014 (O)
AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A. 1869/2013 & I.A. 1870/2013 IN OS 167/2012 of SUB COURT, MANJERI DATED 12.9.2013
PETITIONER:
K.V.SHUKOOR S/O.MUHAMMAD, KUDUKKIL VALAPPILTHODI PULIKKAL AMSOM AND DESOM, ATHIYOORKUNNU (P.O.) MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.DILIP SRI.K.DIVAKARAN NAYAR
RESPONDENT(S):
K.P.MUHAMMED, AGED 59 YEARS S/O.MOOSA, KEEDAKKATTU PUTHAN PEEDIYEKKAL THAYYIL HOUSE, KONDOTTY AMSOM, MELANGADI (P.O.) MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 673638.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether assignees can be impleaded after a long delay in filing suit.
If impleadment is allowed, what costs should the petitioner pay.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.V.Shukoor
- respondent
K.P.Muhammed
Coram
N.K. Balakrishnan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court