Arun v. Janardhanan Pillai
Case brief
What is this about?
Review petition in a special appeal was dismissed without consideration on the ground that the amount directed to be deposited had already been deposited, leaving no point for consideration.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY 2014/27TH POUSHA, 1935
RP.No. 1002 of 2013 () IN SA.239/2003
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN SA 239/2003 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 27-06-2013
REVIEW PETITIONER/2ND RESPONDENT:
ARUN, S/O.SADASIVAN, RAMA MANDIRAM, THEKKANARYADU MURI THEKKAN ARYAD VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADV. SRI.P.SHANES
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT 1 & 3 TO 7:
1. JANARDHANAN PILLAI.B., S/O.P.R.PILLAI, MADAPARAMBIL HOUSE, MUNICIPAL OFFICE WARD ALAPPUZHA - 688 001.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arun
- respondent
Janardhanan Pillai.B.
Coram
N.K. Balakrishnan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court